Skyboard Software
| More

Help | Login

Skyboard Software
Available Processes:
Connections:

sb://movies

sb://movies

Build and Release Management: Understan

Build and Release Management: Understanding The Costs of Doing it Yourself John Graham-Cumming Co-Founder Electric Cloud, Inc.

http://www.electric-cloud.com/images/com

http://www.electric-cloud.com/images/common/electric-cloud_logo.gif

Electric Cloud Solutions Electric Cloud

Electric Cloud Solutions Electric Cloud Products News & Events Customer Success Electric Cloud is the leading provider of solutions that automate, accelerate and analyze the software build - test - deploy process. • Agile development and continuous integration • Optimizing for geographically distributed teams • Virtualized build and test automation • Improved software quality • Tool-agnostic software build management • Cross-platform software build acceleration • Process and tool centralization and control • Visibility and traceability for compliance efforts ElectricCommander, Build-test-deploy automationElectricCommander, Build-test-deploy automation Build-test-deploy automation ElectricAccelerator, Software build accelerationElectricAccelerator, Software build acceleration Software build acceleration ElectricInsight, Software build analyticsElectricInsight, Software build analytics Software build analytics Electric Cloud Announces Support for Building and Testing Software in the Public Cloud Company That Pioneered Private Cloud Computing for Software Production Extends its Offerings to Public Cloud Electric Cloud Named to the 2009 SD Times 100 Electric Cloud is a 2009 Red Herring 100 Winner © 2009 Electric Cloud. All rights reserved. Site Map | Privacy | Terms of Use

The pressures on software development or
The pressures on software development organizations have never been higher. Changes in development methodologies, technology infrastructure, and business requirements continue to strain companies' build-test-deploy processes. Traditional, homegrown approaches are becoming obsolete, as they are too hard to manage, too slow, and too hard to understand. The build-test-deploy process offers the greatest promise for improving the software development process today. For years, tools have addressed front-end software development problems through version control, editors, debuggers, etc. But development teams are now realizing the need to address "back end" software production processes to save time, improve product quality and deliver software to market faster. What is driving the need for investment in the software production process now? * Agile development requires fast, automated builds * Geographically distributed development requires secure, remote access to resources and real-time visibility into results * Virtualized build and test automation requires integrated, flexible, and self-service tools and processes * Quality software requires process automation and a self-service build and test infrastructure * An effective build-test-deploy process across an enterprise requires centralization and control * Compliance efforts require a transparent, repeatable software production process * Build management at an enterprise level requires a scalable, tool-agnostic solution * Build acceleration across platforms requires a foolproof understanding of dependencies

Virtualized Build and Test Automation
Virtualized Build and Test Automation The integration of ElectricCommander® with virtual infrastructure solutions (including VMware® Lab Manager and Microsoft® System Center) allows development organizations to dynamically provision resources for multiplatform builds and tests. This combination creates a "self-service" virtual lab that transforms the build-test-deploy process from scripts written by experts to buttons pushed by end users. This solution: * Dramatically reduces server sprawl through consolidation * Reduces the effort required to configure and run software production environments * Improves quality through early, frequent testing on all target environments and configurations * Reduces the development team's dependence on IT operations. Challenge Impact Electric Cloud Solution Maintaining a SPM infrastructure that is costly and underutilized Organizations losing money by purchasing and maintaining underutilized hardware When used in conjunction with Virtual Lab Management systems, ElectricCommander can dynamically provision either physical or virtual resources without manual intervention from IT operations Time-consuming and labor-intensive for IT to provision development with all required environments Developers either can't validate on all target environments prior to integration builds, or they must wait for IT operations to provide new configurations Allows end-users to easily configure, run and re-use processes and scripts the same way they configure, run and re-use virtual machines SPM processes and tools not automated or optimized for virtual lab environment Development teams cannot take full advantage of flexible, self-service virtualized environment Unified process automation across the entire build/test/deploy lifecycle and across both physical and virtual machines Difficult to reproduce environments after the fact Difficult to effectively diagnose problems Virtual build or test environments that can be versioned and recreated for troubleshooting or auditing

http://www.electric-cloud.com/images/com
http://www.electric-cloud.com/images/common/electric-cloud_logo.gif

ElectricAccelerator vs. distcc: samba re
ElectricAccelerator vs. distcc: samba reloaded July 20, 2009 — Eric Melski ElectricAccelerator vs distcc – samba reloaded In an earlier post I compared the performance of ElectricAcclerator and distcc by building samba using each tool in turn on the same cluster. In that test I found that Accelerator bested distcc at suitably high levels of parallelism, but that distcc narrowly beat Accelerator at lower levels of parallelism. At the time I chalked the difference up to slightly higher overhead associated with Accelerator. But you must have known I couldn’t just leave it at that. I had to know where the overhead was coming from, and eliminate it, if possible. The exciting conclusion is after the break. Read the rest of this entry » Posted in ElectricAccelerator. Tags: distcc, ElectricAccelerator, ElectricAccelerator vs distcc, gmake, parallel builds, performance. Leave a Comment » Public Clouds July 14, 2009 — martinvr Today we announced integrations and compatibility with public cloud computing – specifically Amazon EC2. Cloud computing is a hot topic right now, and rightly so. It provides an easy to deploy, cost-effective, scalable, on-demand computing infrastructure –very timely, given shrinking or frozen IT budgets. I can’t count the number of customers who tell me that compute infrastructure is their #1 bottleneck. At Electric Cloud we have years of experience with internal or “private” clouds (after all, it’s in our name). We help customers set up private clouds, some with hundreds of machines, to accelerate and automate their software build and test tasks. It made sense for us to add public clouds to the mix. You can read the press release here. Our customers gave us some interesting use cases for using our products in combination with the public cloud. Here are some of their ideas: Read the rest of this entry » Posted in Build-Test-Deploy Best Practices, ElectricAccelerator, ElectricCommander, Software Development. Tags: Agile, amazon, amazon aws, amazon ec2, cloud, Cloud Computing, software build, software test, test automation. Leave a Comment » When is Open Source not Enough? July 8, 2009 — Anders Wallgren I recently contributed an article to CM Crossroads on when (or whether) to upgrade from an open source Continuous Integration (CI) system to a fully automated enterprise system. It’s a question we get a lot. To help our customers assess their needs, I always start by asking these seven questions: Read the rest of this entry » Posted in Build-Test-Deploy Best Practices, ElectricCommander. 2 Comments » Java One was Cloud Crazy June 10, 2009 — martinvr I went to Java One last week and was a bit surprised by the amount of cloud chatter. I expected to hear a lot about Larry Ellison and Scott McNealy on stage together. I expected melancholy predictions that this would be the last Java One. I did not expect to hear everyone talking about cloud computing. Don’t get me wrong, I knew that Sun was going to talk about cloud computing. The Sun booth had several stations dedicated to the subject and the Sun store was selling cloud t-shirts. The thing that got me was how many participants were talking about the cloud. All of the technical sessions that had anything to do with cloud computing were packed. Even more surprising was the fact that the sessions extolled the virtues of Amazon EC2 even though Sun is working on their own Cloud offering. I sat through three sessions where the first half hour was dedicated to “Amazon 101”. It looks like Amazon is where real solutions are being created for now but there is definitely competition on the way. Posted in Uncategorized. Tags: amazon, cloud, java one. Leave a Comment » The “last mile” – It often seems like 10 June 2, 2009 — Erin Curtis [This is a guest post from an Electric Cloud technology partner: Daniel Nelson, VP of Products at Phurnace Software (www.phurnace.com)] In the software development lifecycle the results need to ultimately get out into production. The application must make it onto the server, the server needs to be configured and all of the properties, paths and settings need to be correct to get the value of the application. Those in the data center often refer this to the last mile. And it is often a real bear. Seems more like 10 miles at times. Sophisticated and robust tools like ElectricCommander have automated almost all of the steps in the process, but rely on home-grown scripts to lay the applications down on app servers. Why? It is actually a logical approach if you have no alternative. Every environment is different. Every app has different settings for WebSphere (or WebLogic or JBoss) and there is no way to anticipate those differences. Therefore – the last mile is unique to each customer and each app –the IT or dev teams write scripts. It takes skilled resources and the scripts are always in need of attention. Not anymore. STOP. That is no longer necessary. What if ElectricCommander could hand off the EAR file to a software tool that has already pre-built a model of the environment and has made all of the JDBC, JMS, and application bindings for you? What if it required NO scripting? What if the “last mile” was now automated and under the control of your build and release system? Ta Da ! It is now. Phurnace Software is an auto deployment and configuration tool that will eliminate custom scripting. And you can drive it all from within ElectricCommander. The last mile is now just a step away. - Daniel Nelson, VP of Products, Phurnace Software Posted in Build-Test-Deploy Best Practices, Software Development. Tags: deployment, Java, WebSphere. Leave a Comment » JavaOne 2009 June 1, 2009 — Erin Curtis Planning to head to JavaOne this week? Stop by our booth in the Expo Hall and say hello. We’ll have product experts on hand to show you our latest and greatest solutions for Java development. Come see us at booth #304. http://java.sun.com/javaone/ Posted in Uncategorized. Tags: Java. Leave a Comment » Annocat: e pluribus unum May 27, 2009 — Eric Melski ElectricAccelerator annotation files are a fantastic way to get a grip on your build behavior and performance, but what if your Build (capital B) spans more than one invocation of emake? Annotation gives you a good look inside any single invocation, but there’s no way to get an overview of the entire process. You can’t just catenate the annotation files from subsequent emake runs — the result won’t be well-formed XML, and the timing information for jobs in each subsection of the build will reflect time from the start of that subsection, not from the start of the logical build. Plus, you run the risk of having overlapping job identifiers in different subsections. What you need is a specialized version of cat that is annotation-aware. In this article I’ll introduce annocat, a simple Perl script I wrote for just this purpose, and I’ll explain how it works. Read the rest of this entry »

newseed9
newseed9

newseed10
newseed10

History:




















Skyboard Software Copyright 2009 Rendered with Skyboard Software 0.0.0.77:3584

 

 

 

 

 



* All your data is kept encrypted like it should be.
companies need to be proactive in dealing with customers vital details.
Please feel safe and secure. Skyboard Software© has your interests at heart.

Enjoy Skyboard Software © from Lenn Dolling & Joe Hatoum (founders)